Tuesday, 28 February 2012

Ruling on wearing a necklace with a picture of al-Masjid al-Aqsa or the Ka’bah

Is it permissible for me to buy a necklace with a picture of al-Masjid al-Aqsa or the holy Ka’bah?.

Praise be to Allaah.

There is nothing wrong with wearing a necklace on which is a picture of al-Masjid al-Aqsa or the holy Ka’bah, unless it has the name of Allaah or anything from the Qur’aan engraved on it, in which case it is not allowed to wear it because it is disrespectful, or the aim in wearing it is to seek blessing from the picture of these places that are venerated by Muslims. In that case it is not permissible to wear it. 

See also question no. 91370. 

And Allaah knows best.

Woman uncovering part of her body in front of other women

Is it permissible for a woman to uncover any part of her chest, or what is called the ribs or her forearms or legs in front of other women?.

Praise be to Allaah.

As for the forearms, there is nothing wrong with uncovering them in front of women, and there is also nothing wrong with showing the neck and head in front of other women, but we offer some advice to our womenfolk in the hope that Allaah may benefit them thereby. We say: the more covering the clothes are, the better it is for them, and we tell them not to follow whatever may be in these magazines and copy what is shown in them, because that leads women to resemble kaafir women whether they want to or not. The more covered women are, the better. Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (may Allaah have mercy on him) stated that the women of the Sahaabah wore garments that covered them from the hand to the ankle, and this is what is best. There is nothing wrong if the calves show, but we are not suggesting that she wear a dress that comes down only to the knees, because there may be cause for concern about that, since may go further than that and shorten their dresses to above the knee. But if a woman lifts up her garment to do something and her sister sees her do that, there is nothing wrong with it. But if the garment is designed to come down only to the knees, we do not think that is right, rather we think that it should come down to the ankles. End quote. 

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him).

Elderly woman uncovering her face before non-mahrams

Is it permissible for an elderly woman to uncover her face before men who are not her mahrams?.

Praise be to Allaah.

Yes, Allaah has permitted elderly women to uncover their faces before non-mahram men, but that is subject to the condition that they do not uncover anything of their adornment that may be a cause of fitnah, so they should not wear attractive or fancy clothes or put any cosmetics on their faces to beautify them. 

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“And as for women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock, it is no sin on them if they discard their (outer) clothing in such a way as not to show their adornment. But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them. And Allaah is All‑Hearer, All‑Knower”

[al-Noor 24:60]. 

Abu Bakr al-Jassaas (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: With regard to the words of Allaah, “women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock” [al-Noor 24:60], Ibn Mas’ood and Mujaahid said: Women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock are those who do not want it, and their outer garments are their jilbabs. 

Then he said: There is no dispute that the hair of an elderly woman is ‘awrah and it is not permissible for a non-mahram to look at it, as is the case with the hair of a young woman. If she prays with her head uncovered, then like a young woman (in the same situation), her prayer is invalid. So it cannot be that the meaning is that she may take off her head covering in the presence of a non-mahram man. Rather it is permitted for an elderly woman to take off her outer garment in the presence of men, after she has covered her head, and it is permitted for her to uncover her face and hands, because she is not desirable. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them” [al-Noor 24:60]. So He has permitted her to take off her jilbab, but He says that refraining by not taking off her garment before men is better for her. End quote. 

Ahkaam al-Qur’aan (3/485). 

Ibn al-‘Arabi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said: 

This is mentioned only for women past childbearing age, in exclusion to others, because they are no longer desirable, but refraining by keeping the full covering is better than doing that which is permitted to them, namely taking off their outer garments. End quote. 

Ahkaam al-Qur’aan (3/419). 

Al-Sa’di (may Allaah have mercy on him) said (p. 670):  

Women who are past childbearing are those who no longer have any interest in intimacy and desire, “women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock” [al-Noor 24:60], i.e., they do not hope to get married and they are not wanted in marriage, because they have grown old and are not desirable. “it is no sin on them” i.e., there is no blame on them, “if they discard their (outer) clothing” i.e., outer garments such as the khimaar and so on, concerning which Allaah says “and to draw their veils all over Juyoobihinna (i.e. their bodies, faces, necks and bosoms)” [al-Noor 24:31]. It is permissible for these women to uncover their faces, because there is no fear of temptation. And because allowing them to take off their outer garment may be taken as meaning that they are allowed to adorn themselves, the matter is clarified by the words: “in such a way as not to show their adornment” i.e., without showing their adornment to people, by beautifying the outer garment or striking their ground with their feet so as to let people know about their hidden adornments, because the mere fact that a female is wearing adornments, even if she covers them, and even if she is not desirable, is a cause of fitnah which causes the one who looks at it to fall into sin. “But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them” [al-Noor 24:60]. End quote. 

Shaykh ‘Abd al-‘Azeez ibn Baaz (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked: 

Is it permissible for a woman of advanced years, such as 70 or 90 years old, to uncover her face before her non-mahram relatives? 

He replied: 

Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):  

“And as for women past childbearing who do not expect wedlock, it is no sin on them if they discard their (outer) clothing in such a way as not to show their adornment. But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them. And Allaah is All‑Hearer, All‑Knower”

[al-Noor 24:60]. 

Women past childbearing are elderly women who are not desired in marriage and who do not put on adornment. There is no sin on them if they uncover their faces before non-mahrams, but for them to observe hijab is better and is more on the safe side, because Allaah says “But to refrain (i.e. not to discard their outer clothing) is better for them” [al-Noor 24:60]. And in some cases seeing them may cause fitnah because of their beautiful appearance even if they are old and not wearing adornment. But if they are wearing adornment, it is not permissible for them to refrain from observing hijab. Adornment includes beautifying the face with kohl and the like. And Allaah is the source of strength. End quote. 

Fataawa al-Mar’ah al-Muslimah (1/424). 

And Allaah knows best.

Dyeing the hair brown and blond

Is it permissible for a woman to dye her hair blond?.

Praise be to Allaah.

There is no report of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbidding dyeing the hair any colour except black. There is nothing wrong with a woman dyeing her hair any other colour – brown or blond or any other, so long as by doing so she is not imitating kaafir women or immoral women. 

Shaykh Muhammad ibn ‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah have mercy on him) was asked about the ruling on a woman dyeing her hair any colour other than black, such as brown or blond? 

He replied: 

The basic principle is that this is permissible, so long as it does not lead to resembling kaafir women or immoral women, because that is haraam. End quote.

Dyeing some parts of the hair only

Is it permissible to dye some parts of the hair, such as the ends only or the top only?.

Praise be to Allaah.

If the hair is dyed black, the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) forbade that, when he ordered changing white hair but avoiding black. He said: “Change this white hair but avoid black.” 

There is also a stern warning against doing that, which indicates that it is haraam to change white hair by dyeing it black. As for changing it by dyeing it other colours, the basic principle is that it is permissible, unless it is done in the manner of kaafir women or immoral women, in which case it is haraam for that reason, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Whoever imitates a people is one of them.” End quote.

Will Allaah punish women who make a wanton display of their beauty (tabarruj)?

My question is about the grave sinners, we believe that his/her matter is up to Allah, if Allah wills He will punish or forgive them. But the hadeeth in which the prophet, peace be upon him says: “there are two types of people I have not seen, (until he mentions), and women who are clothed yet naked, they will not enter paradise or even smell its fragrance” this hadeeth was explained by imam an-nawawi, may Allah have mercy on him, as follows: 
If they do what they do believing it is not haram, then they will never enter paradise. Or they may be punished in hell first then they will enter paradise. 
This means they will definitely be punished first and they are of evil doers, is it possible that they might not be punished?.

Praise be to Allaah.

According to Muslim belief, the one who commits a major sin is in grave danger and has exposed himself to the punishment of Allaah, but the will of Allaah is to decide, and Allaah may forgive or pardon him, or He may punish him in a manner commensurate with his sin, except for the one whose sin reaches the level of disbelief in Allaah. In that case he will deserve to be punished and to abide forever in Hell. 

Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah was asked – as it says in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (11/646) – about women who pile their hair on top of their heads, and they will not see Paradise or smell its fragrance. But it is narrated in the hadeeth from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him): “Whoever says La ilaaha ill-Allaah will enter Paradise.” 

He replied:

It is proven in Saheeh Muslim and elsewhere from Abu Hurayrah that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “There are two types of the people of Hell whom I have not seen: men with whips like the tails of cattle with which they strike the people, and women who are clothed but naked, walking with an enticing gait, with something like the humps of camels on their heads. They will not enter Paradise nor even smell its fragrance, and its fragrance can be smelled from such and such a distance.”

Whoever claims that this hadeeth is not saheeh and that what it mentions of the severe punishment is not true is ignorant and has gone astray from the path of sharee’ah, and he deserves a punishment that will deter him and other ignorant people like him who object to the saheeh ahaadeeth that are soundly narrated from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him). 

There are many saheeh ahaadeeth about this warning. For example: 

“Whoever kills a mu’aahid unlawfully will not smell the fragrance of Paradise, although its fragrance may be detected from a distance of forty years.” 

“No one will enter Paradise in whose heart is a mustard seed’s worth of arrogance.” 

“There are three to whom Allaah will not speak on the Day of Resurrection nor will He praise them, and their will be a painful torment: an old man who commits zina, a king who tells lies and a poor man who is arrogant.” 

There are verses in the Qur’aan which speak of this warning, such as the verse in which Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):  

“And whosoever disobeys Allaah and His Messenger (Muhammad صلى الله عليه وسلم), and transgresses His limits, He will cast him into the Fire, to abide therein; and he shall have a disgraceful torment”

[al-Nisa’ 4:14] 

This is something on which the Muslims are agreed, that the warning in the Qur’aan and Sunnah to those who commit major sins is true, but Allaah has stated in the Qur’aan and the Sunnah of His Messenger (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) that the warning mentioned in the Qur’aan and Sunnah does not apply to the one who repents, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): “Say: O ‘Ibaadi (My slaves) who have transgressed against themselves (by committing evil deeds and sins)! Despair not of the Mercy of Allaah, verily, Allaah forgives all sins. Truly, He is Oft‑Forgiving, Most Merciful”

[al-Zumar 39:53]

i.e., to the one who repents. 

In another verse Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Verily, Allaah forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship), but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He wills” [al-Nisa’ 4:48]. 

This applies to the one who does not repent. Shirk will not be forgiven, but with regard to anything less than shirk, if Allaah wills He will forgive and if He wills He will punish for it. 

In al-Saheehayn it is narrated that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “No tiredness, exhaustion, worry, grief, distress or harm befalls a believer in this world, not even a thorn that pricks him, but Allaah expiates some of his sins thereby.” 

Hence when the verse (interpretation of the meaning): “whosoever works evil, will have the recompense thereof” [al-Nisa’ 4:123] was revealed, Abu Bakr said: O Messenger of Allaah, this is going to destroy us; who among us has not done evil? He said: “O Abu Bakr, do you not get tired? Do you not grieve? Do you not go through hardship? That is part of the recompense.”  

By means of calamities in this world, Allaah expiates the sins of the believers that may be expiated by means thereof, and the same applies to the good deeds that he does. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “Verily, the good deeds remove the evil deeds” [Hood 11:114]. And the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The five daily prayers, from one Jumu’ah to the next, and one Ramadaan to the next, are expiations for whatever (of minor sins) come in between them, so long as one avoids major sins.” And Allaah does not wrong His slaves in the slightest, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): 

“So whosoever does good equal to the weight of an atom (or a small ant) shall see it.

8. And whosoever does evil equal to the weight of an atom (or a small ant) shall see it”

[al-Zalzalah 99:7-8]. 

So the warning may be cancelled out, either by means of repentance, or by means of good deeds that one does which are equal to the bad deeds, or by means of calamities through which Allaah expiates sins, or by other means. End quote. 

Hence the scholars interpreted every verse or hadeeth the apparent meaning of which is that those who commit major sins will abide forever in Hell in ways that are in accordance with other texts of the Qur’aan and Sunnah. 

Al-Nawawi (may Allaah have mercy on him) said in Sharh Muslim (17/191): 

The words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), “will not enter Paradise” may be interpreted in two ways: 

(i)

They may be interpreted as referring to the one who regards what is haraam as permissible, despite knowing that it is haraam; so she is a kaafir who will abide forever in Hell and will never enter Paradise. 

(ii)

It may be interpreted as meaning that she will not enter it at first along with those who are successful. End quote. 

It says in Fataawa al-Lajnah al-Daa’imah (2/27): 

Question: is it permissible for us to believe that the women who are clothed yet naked are kaafirs, because the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said, “They will not enter Paradise nor will they smell its fragrance…”? 

Answer: 

Those who believe that it is permissible after being told about the ruling and having it explained to them may be regarded as kaafirs. Those who do not regard it as permissible but still go out clothed yet naked are not kaafirs, but they are committing a major sin and they have to give it up and repent to Allaah from that, in the hope that Allaah may forgive them. If a woman dies in that state without having repented to Allaah, then she is subject to the will of Allaah, like all those who commit sin, because Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning):

“Verily, Allaah forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship), but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He wills” [al-Nisa’ 4:48]. End quote. 

It also says (17/104): 

Those women who regard that type of dressing as permissible are kaafirs who will abide forever in Hell if they die in that state, and they will not enter Paradise or smell its fragrance. If they wear that type of clothing even though they believe it is haraam, then they are committing a major sin, but that does not put them beyond the pale of Islam, and they are subject to the will of Allaah: if Allaah wills He will forgive them and if He wills He will punish them for the bad deeds they have committed, and they will not enter Paradise or smell its fragrance until after they have been punished first. 

This is the view of Ahl al-Sunnah, which reconciles the texts which speak of promise with those which speak of warning. This is the middle path between the views of the Murji’is, Khawaarij and Mu’tazliah. 

Shaykh Ibn Baaz said in Majmoo’ al-Fataawa (6/356): 

With regard to the words of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him), “they will not enter Paradise nor smell its fragrance”, this is a stern warning, but that does not imply that they are kaafirs, and they will not abide forever in Hell; this applies to all sinners who die as Muslims. Rather they and other sinners are all given the threat of Hell for their sins, but they are subject to the will of Allaah: if He wills He will pardon them and forgive them, and if He wills He will punish them, as He said in two places in Soorat al-Nisa’: “Verily, Allaah forgives not that partners should be set up with Him (in worship), but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He wills” [al-Nisa’ 4:48].  The sinner who enters Hell will not abide therein forever as is the case with the kaafir; rather those who are meant to abide there forever – such as the murderer, adulterer and one who committed suicide – their abiding therein is not the same as that of the kuffaar, rather it is an abiding that will come to an end, according to Ahl al-Sunnah wa’l-Jamaa’ah, unlike the Khawaarij and Mutazilah and those innovators who followed in their footsteps. The mutawaatir saheeh ahaadeeth from the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) indicate that he (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) will intercede for the sinners among his ummah, and that Allaah will accept his intercession several times, and each time He will stipulate a number for him and he will bring them forth from Hell. The same applies to the rest of the Messengers, believers and angels – all of them will intercede by His leave and He will accept their intercession for whomever He wills of the people of Tawheed who entered Hell because of their sins and are Muslims. Then there will remain in Hell the rest of the sinners who were not included in the intercession of the intercessors, but Allaah will bring them out by His mercy and kindness, and there will be no one left in Hell but the kuffaar who will abide therein forever and ever, as Allaah says concerning the kuffaar (interpretation of the meaning): 

“whenever it abates, We shall increase for them the fierceness of the Fire”

[al-Isra’ 17:97] 

“So taste you (the results of your evil actions). No increase shall We give you, except in torment”

[al-Naba’ 78:30] 

And He says concerning the kuffaar who worship idols (interpretation of the meaning):

“Thus Allaah will show them their deeds as regrets for them. And they will never get out of the Fire”

[al-Baqarah 2:167] 

“Verily, those who disbelieve, if they had all that is in the earth, and as much again therewith to ransom themselves thereby from the torment on the Day of Resurrection, it would never be accepted of them, and theirs would be a painful torment”

[al-Maa’idah 5:36] 

“They will long to get out of the Fire, but never will they get out therefrom; and theirs will be a lasting torment”

[al-Maa’idah 5:37] 

And there are many similar verses. We ask Allaah to keep us safe and sound from being like them. End quote. 

To sum up, the woman who makes a wanton display of herself (tabarruj), despite the fact that she is exposing herself to a painful punishment from Allaah, is still subject to the will of Allaah: He may forgive her and not punish her, or He may subject her to a painful punishment. Moreover, some of the believers who commit sins will inevitably enter Hell, as is mentioned in the mutawaatir ahaadeeth.  

See also the answer to question no. 14627 and 9924

 

Important note to learn and online quran recitation

The true knowledge of Islam is in reading quran online  and bring the true succeed in to our daily life we should learn holy quran online as much as we could and not just in Arabic but try to understand the meaning of it so when ever we listen to quran online we can understand the Koran and learn how to read quran online it gives us the guidance to bring the purity in to our life with the true way and also spread the word of Islam and its knowledge to all over the world find  holy quran reciter and more Islamic articles in this learning quran blog and feel free to spread it further as much as you could join live quran teacher and  do quran memorization online

 

And Allaah knows best.

Thursday, 16 February 2012

Zakat in individual amounts will not reach the level of nisaab

I put some money in my young children’s name into shares of an investment company. Should I put it all together when calculating zakaat, or should I work it out individually, knowing that if I do not put it all together, the individual amounts will not reach the level of nisaab?

Praise be to Allaah.

We put this question to Shaykh Muhammad ibn Saalih al-‘Uthaymeen (may Allaah preserve him) and he answered as follows: “Every person has his own money, so if it reaches the level of nisaab, he should pay zakaat, otherwise he should not. But does he have other children to whom he has given the same? If he has other children then let him fear Allaah and treat them fairly, “to the male, a portion equal to that of two females” [al-Nisa’ 4:11 – interpretation of the meaning]. If he does not have other children, then the matter is clear. If he has other children and he gives them the same as he has given to these, then he has treated them fairly and he does not have to do anything more… And Allaah knows best.”